Saturday, March 27, 2004
This is truly shameful.
OK, read this.
Now, read this.
The money paragraph in the second story:
Military officials insist their case for attacking Zarqawi’s operation was airtight, but the administration feared destroying the terrorist camp in Iraq could undercut its case for war against Saddam.
We could have easily taken out the guy who was likely responsible for 3/11, not to mention over 700 and counting killed by his attacks in Iraq. Is there no end to the damage being done by this administration's obsession with Saddam? How many people will have to die?
|
Now, read this.
The money paragraph in the second story:
Military officials insist their case for attacking Zarqawi’s operation was airtight, but the administration feared destroying the terrorist camp in Iraq could undercut its case for war against Saddam.
We could have easily taken out the guy who was likely responsible for 3/11, not to mention over 700 and counting killed by his attacks in Iraq. Is there no end to the damage being done by this administration's obsession with Saddam? How many people will have to die?
Comments:
Post a Comment
